|
Resources,
Budget, and Finance
Curriculum
Guidelines Summary
What
Court Leaders Need to Know and Be Able to Do
The
six Guidelines and the related knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) are
integrated and interdependent. Budget
planning tools must be oriented by purpose and vision and support data
acquisition and analysis. Leadership
and interpersonal effectiveness make budget planning, problem diagnosis,
and change possible. Technology
aids both accounting and cost-benefit analysis, which establishes a basis
for budget controls and performance monitoring.
The six interrelated managerial, technical, and interpersonal
Guidelines are:
 Curriculum
Guidelines
Court
Purposes and Vision
Fundamentals Leadership
Teams and Interpersonal Effectiveness Problem
Diagnosis and Change Technology
Budget
Controls and Performance Monitoring
The
court’s allocation, acquisition, and management of its resources must be
oriented to the court’s purposes and responsibilities and its future
vision. Absent understanding
of the purposes of the courts and a preferred future, legitimate criteria
for budget requests and determining success in using available resources
will be lacking. Competent
court leaders know how to manage the court budget in support of the
court’s core purposes, including working effectively in court executive
leadership teams and with other judges and staff and legislative and
executive branch leaders to establish the future vision.
Vision is needed to drive court budget and finance, including
resource allocation and acquisition.
This requires understanding how others outside the court perceive
its purpose and functions and how their views may support or threaten
judicial branch independence, performance, and funding.
Effective
court leaders articulate a long-term vision based on an understanding of
court purposes and priorities and environmental trends.
They connect the vision to long-term financial plans through
adjusting to the environment and multi-year budget planning.
Allocation of resources consistently supports the court’s
purposes, vision, and priorities. This
sustains organizational commitment to financial management that is tied to
the court’s vision.
Fundamentals
While
court managers need not be technically competent in every tool and
analytical method, they must know: 1) which tool addresses what budget and
financial question; 2) the prerequisites for their use; 3) how to select
and manage fiscal staff; and 4) how to be intelligent consumers of
financial reports and projections. Court
leaders must understand that budget and finance fundamentals are means
rather than ends unto themselves.
Understanding
and using appropriate budget tools and techniques result in reliable,
accurate financial data on an on-going and timely basis. The court can then generate and weigh the costs and benefits
of alternative court programs and resource allocation decisions.
Competency means acquiring and using valid and reliable data to
support work measurement and weighted caseload analysis, court budget
planning, program delivery, auditing, assessment of outcomes, and very
importantly, reallocation decisions and budget requests.
Leadership
and Interpersonal Effectiveness
Expert
court budgeting requires expert leadership and management of the court,
its budget and finance staff, and resources.
Budgeting is not a technical, once-a-year bookkeeping exercise.
The ability to be persuasive when presenting court needs and
budgets depends on the personal creditability of court leaders and their
commitment to court performance and fiscal responsibility.
Leadership of the court, its resources, and budget staff and
processes requires will and interpersonal skill.
Leaders need focused staff who are aligned with courts purposes,
leaders, and workflows and produce technically sound and reliable data and
reports. Proposed budgets and
financial reports must take into account the concerns of judicial leaders
and their executive and legislative branch counterparts.
The
court executive leadership team negotiates effectively with judges, other
court employees, and executive and legislative branch leaders and their
staffs. Leaders forge
consensus, create effective judicial teamwork, and maintain accountability
and partnerships based on results, trust, honesty, and a desired positive
managerial reputation.
Problem
Diagnosis and Change
Problem
diagnosis involves keeping current with wider societal trends and their
implications for courts and their budgets, as well as anticipating,
identifying, and diagnosing court problems.
Reliable diagnosis differentiates among problems with financial
roots or causes and those having other origins, and enables court leaders
working with others to address emerging and persistent court budget and
finance problems. When
problem diagnosis indicates the need for change in the way resources are
allocated and what new resources are needed, changes are made.
Effective leaders ensure that financial problem diagnosis is
consistent with the purposes, vision, goals, and long-term financial plan
of the court.
Technology
When
properly applied and managed, information technology supports and improves
budget and financial planning, decisions, and management.
Important tools include personal computers, spreadsheets, database,
and financial management software. But
these tools will not be effective without qualified and well-managed staff
who use appropriate hardware and software to gather and present meaningful
information. The statistics,
workload and outcome measures, and cost accounting made possible through
information technology must be readily available and responsive to the
judiciary and its leadership, other branches of government, and the public
to help ensure judicial accountability within and outside the courts.
Budget
Controls and Performance Monitoring
Courts
must account for their use of public funds.
But accounting for public expenditures extends past accounting to
measuring the outcomes and outputs produced with the court’s budget and
resources. Court leaders must
know and then report whether or not established program objectives were
met. Evaluation enables
courts and others to understand court expenditures and performance, to
improve the allocation of available resources, and, very importantly, to
support requests for continued and new funding.
Reliable and timely budget controls, when coupled with
well-executed and clearly presented performance monitoring, increase the
court’s internal and external accountability and build public trust and
confidence in the judiciary.
Click on each of the
six Curriculum Guidelines to see the
associated Knowledge, Skills and Abilities:
Court
Purposes and Vision
Fundamentals Leadership
Teams and Interpersonal Effectiveness Problem
Diagnosis and Change Technology
Budget
Controls and Performance Monitoring
Resources,
Budget, and Finance MSWord version for printing.
(A
password window will appear. Click Cancel).
Resources,
Budget, and Finance Adobe Acrobat 5.0 version for printing.
The above files are
Adobe Acrobat pdf files, and require the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to
download, view, and print. You can download the free reader here.
Contact
the webmaster
Home
|
